Daniela Fuentes had already spent years fighting for the ability to live openly as herself before U.S. detention pushed her back toward hiding. The 32-year-old Cuban trans woman had built a life in Miami around family, beauty work, clients, and drag performance after leaving Cuba and traveling through Central America. She told EL PAÍS that Miami gave her room to be Daniela again after earlier periods when she had changed how she dressed during migration because she believed presenting as a man was safer.

That changed after Daniela was detained in Florida. At the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center, she says she was made to remove the clothes she had been wearing and put on a male inmate uniform. Her wig was taken, and she says she was treated as a man from that point forward. Daniela described the experience as devastating because the appearance she had fought to build was tied to the life she had fought to live openly. Later, at the Lake County Detention Center, she cut hair that had grown to the middle of her back and began changing how she walked, greeted people, and used her voice. She described herself as being in “survival mode.”

Daniela said people at the detention center watched over her safety, and she chose to cut her hair and change aspects of her presentation because she believed it would make moving through detention safer. She began walking differently, changed how she greeted people, and moderated her voice. By the time deportation came, she had adapted her appearance and behavior around the question of what would help her survive.

On August 31, that survival calculation followed Daniela onto an ICE-operated deportation flight. EL PAÍS reports that she traveled for roughly 22 hours with other deportees and says nobody told her beforehand that she was being sent to the Central African Republic. Daniela said armed officers arrived before the removal, but she did not learn during preparations that Africa would be her destination. Several hours into the flight, officers confirmed where the group was being taken. She said she would have chosen Cuba had that option been given to her.

Daniela arrived in Bangui with the same problem she had confronted in detention: deciding when it was safe to be visibly herself. She says people have pointed at her body and mocked her, and she described feeling unsafe because of the homophobia she encounters around her. During one trip to a supermarket, she said people pointed at her breasts and initially refused to sell her what she had come to buy. Her response has been to limit how openly she presents herself and to spend much of her time inside. “I feel very unsafe here,” she told EL PAÍS.

The wig taken from Daniela when she entered detention was eventually returned to her after she reached the Central African Republic. She now sometimes puts it on privately in the bathroom and looks at herself in the mirror. “That’s when I remember who I am,” she said. The men sharing housing with her know she is trans and, according to Daniela, have been protective of her, but she still describes the version of herself moving through daily life in Bangui as “in disguise.”

Daniela does not want to remain there. She has contacted Cuban consular authorities seeking a way back to Cuba, but EL PAÍS reports that she currently has no passport or other identification. A Cuban official told her that a temporary travel document would be processed, though Daniela was not given a timeline. Her plan is itself another measure of the pressure surrounding her: she expects to leave Africa presenting as Daniel, then return to her sister’s home in Cuba and put her wig, earrings, lashes, and acrylic nails back on before trying to rebuild a life as Daniela again.

What happened to Daniela unfolded while federal protections and transparency around trans people in immigration detention were being rolled back. The Vera Institute reported that after Donald Trump returned to office, an executive order directed federal custody placements according to sex rather than gender identity. ICE subsequently removed its 2015 Transgender Care Memorandum from its website and amended at least three detention contracts to remove transgender-care requirements. Vera also reported that ICE stopped including transgender population statistics in public detention reports; the last report containing those figures listed 47 trans people in custody and 69 fiscal-year book-ins as of January 12, 2025.

Daniela’s deportation also sits inside a wider third-country removal system affecting LGBTQ immigrants. Immigration Equality reported in June that LGBTQ refugees and asylum seekers have been sent to third countries where the organization says they may face persecution, detention, torture, or death, including some people who had previously received protection in the United States. The organization has raised concerns about whether LGBTQ people are being transferred to countries where their sexual orientation or gender identity may expose them to new danger.

For Daniela, those larger policies have an immediate human consequence. She had already learned to change her appearance while crossing countries, then did it again while moving through U.S. detention, and now says she is doing it once more after being deported thousands of miles from the life she had built. The unresolved accountability is not only why the United States sent Daniela specifically to the Central African Republic without telling her the destination in advance, but what consideration was given to the safety of a known trans woman before placing her in a country where she now says she cannot comfortably live openly as herself.

Daniela is still trying to leave. Until she can, the life she describes in Bangui is divided between the person other people see and the woman she reconnects with privately when she puts her wig back on. She spent years fighting to live openly as Daniela. After detention and third-country deportation, she is again measuring survival by how much of Daniela she believes she can safely show.

Trans United will continue following Daniela Fuentes for any significant development in her case, including her efforts to secure travel documents and leave the Central African Republic.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to Trans United to help sustain reporting that documents the harm trans people face in detention, deportation, and displacement while keeping their lives and voices at the center of the public record.

Upgrade

⁠RELATED REPORTING — THIRD-COUNTRY DEPORTATIONS

AMERICANS AGAINST ICE •Expose ICE Abuse & Lies

ICE DEPORTED CARLOS TELLEZ SANCHEZ TO LIBERIA, SEPARATING HIM FROM HIS WIFE AND 5-MONTH-OLD SON

Carlos Tellez Sanchez had spent years building a life in Texas before the United States government sent him almost 6,000 miles away from it. The 35-year-old Venezuelan father worked at a Dallas car dealership during the day and made Uber E…

Read more

25 days ago · 22 likes · 3 comments · RESIST | FIGHT™

AMERICANS AGAINST ICE •Expose ICE Abuse & Lies

Trump Is Deporting Protected Immigrants to Countries They Have Never Called Home

Immigrants who had already won protection from being sent back to countries where they could face persecution, torture, or death were still forced out of the United States through a different route. Instead of returning some of them to the countries they fled, the Trump administration sent them to the Central African Republic — a country many had no tie…

Listen now

20 days ago · 38 likes · 12 comments · RESIST | FIGHT™

AMERICANS AGAINST ICE •Expose ICE Abuse & Lies

ICE Sent Cuban Father Roberto Mosquera to Rot in an Eswatini Prison Without a Charge or Sentence

Roberto Mosquera has spent more than a year inside a maximum-security prison in Eswatini, thousands of miles from the wife and four daughters he left behind in the United States. He is not serving an Eswatini criminal sentence, and authorities there have not charge…

Read more

a month ago · 43 likes · 5 comments · RESIST | FIGHT™

Renata Santos was 31 years old when firefighters found her without vital signs in the Jardim Surubi neighborhood of Itaperuna, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. She had suffered stab wounds, and the 143rd Police Precinct opened a homicide investigation into her death.

Local reporting placed the attack near the corner of Laudicéia de F. Jesus and Alice Godefroy da Costa streets. Investigators processed the scene and began working to determine who killed her and what led to the attack. At publication, no arrest had been reported.

The public record preserves the circumstances of Renata’s killing more clearly than the life she lived before it. Her name, age, trans identity, city and manner of death are documented, while little biographical information about her has surfaced publicly. The lack of a fuller record should not reduce her to the violence that ended her life.

Her death came during a deadly stretch in Itaperuna. Local reporting recorded multiple homicides in the city during the first half of September, including another killing in the same Surubi neighborhood earlier that day.

Renata also enters a wider 2026 record of trans people killed across Brazil. Trans United has documented multiple cases, while Trans Day of Remembrance monitoring has recorded additional trans people killed across the country during the same period. That broader record shows the persistent lethal violence affecting trans communities while Renata’s individual motive remains unresolved.

What remains missing is accountability. The public still does not know who killed Renata, why she was killed, whether investigators have identified a person of interest, or whether the homicide investigation has produced evidence capable of bringing the person responsible into court.

Renata’s killing remains under investigation. Trans United will continue following the case for any suspect identification, arrest, charge, established motive, or other significant development.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to Trans United to help sustain reporting that documents trans lives lost to violence and keeps the people harmed at the center of the public record.

Upgrade

Paola Buenrostro was 25 when she was killed in Mexico City on September 30, 2016. She was a trans woman who had moved from Chiapas after facing violence and family exclusion, and the friends she built a life with in the capital became her family. Nearly ten years after her death, those same people are still fighting over something that should never have required a decade of pressure: whether the justice system would recognize who Paola was and treat the violence against her accordingly.

On the night she was killed, Paola got into a car near Puente de Alvarado, an area known for trans sex work. According to reporting and evidence later presented in court, she called for help shortly afterward and shouted the name of her friend Kenya Cuevas. Kenya ran toward the vehicle and heard gunshots. She reached the car while Paola was dying and began recording what was happening. Police arrested Arturo “N” at the scene, but he was released about 48 hours later.

An arrest warrant was issued on October 19, 2016. For almost a decade, it remained outstanding while Paola’s case became a record not only of unresolved accountability, but of institutional erasure. Mexico City authorities failed to recognize Paola as a woman in the original handling of the case, misgendered her, and did not initially recognize Kenya as her social family or as an indirect victim.

The institutional erasure surrounding Paola’s case continued into the 2026 proceedings. After Arturo “N” was arrested on August 31, nearly ten years after the warrant was issued, the first hearing treated the killing as aggravated homicide rather than femicide. Reporting from Grupo Animal and Agencia Presentes says Paola was again misgendered during the proceeding, while Kenya and other trans women connected to the case were also addressed in ways that denied their gender identities. The response outside the courtroom was immediate: activists protested and occupied the offices of the Femicide Investigation Prosecutor’s Office, arguing that authorities were repeating the same institutional violence that had followed Paola’s case since 2016.

Kenya had not spent ten years demanding only that an arrest finally happen. She had spent those years demanding that Paola be recognized in the record as the woman she was and that the circumstances surrounding her killing be understood as gendered violence against a trans woman. That distinction mattered because misgendering Paola did more than insult her memory. It changed the legal and institutional frame through which her killing was understood.

The second hearing, held on September 4, marked a different turn. A Mexico City judge approved the prosecution’s request to reclassify the case from aggravated homicide to aggravated femicide and bound Arturo “N” over for prosecution under that charge. The judge also formally recognized Paola as a woman and Kenya Cuevas as an indirect victim and part of Paola’s social family.

Arturo “N” remains accused, and the criminal case remains unresolved. But the legal recognition matters because Paola’s gender identity and the gendered context of her killing are now part of the court record rather than something her community is being forced to defend from outside it.

The court also considered arguments that Paola’s work as a sex worker and the circumstances surrounding the killing were relevant to the femicide classification. Agencia Presentes reported that the judge cited Mexican Supreme Court precedent recognizing that violent deaths of trans women can fall within the crime of femicide, as well as the Inter-American human-rights case Vicky Hernández v. Honduras, which addressed violence rooted in prejudice tied to gender identity and expression.

The case is not being prosecuted under Mexico City’s newer transfemicide offense. Paola was killed in 2016, years before that offense existed, so the current prosecution proceeds under the femicide framework available for conduct at the time.

For Kenya, that recognition came after years in which the legal system repeatedly failed to record Paola correctly. Agencia Presentes quoted her after the hearing saying she had waited since September 2016 for Paola’s life and identity to be recognized. The judge’s decision also formally recognized Kenya’s relationship to Paola, acknowledging the social family that institutions had previously failed to treat as family at all.

That part of the ruling reaches beyond courtroom terminology. Trans women who are rejected by biological relatives often build families through friendship, community and mutual survival. When institutions refuse to recognize those relationships after a death, the people who knew the victim best can be pushed outside the process meant to determine what happened to her. In Paola’s case, Kenya’s persistence kept both Paola’s identity and the demand for accountability alive through nearly a decade of delay.

Nearly ten years after Paola was killed, accountability remains unfinished. The prosecution still has to proceed, the allegations still have to be adjudicated, and the case still carries the weight of the years in which Paola’s identity was denied inside the very system asked to deliver justice for her. What has changed is that her chosen family no longer has to fight from outside the record simply to establish who she was.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to Trans United to help sustain independent reporting that documents violence against trans people, follows the institutions responsible, and keeps victims like Paola Buenrostro at the center of the public record.

Upgrade

Channel Ferro Badell had already survived discrimination, trafficking and abuse before she entered ICE custody. During the six months that followed, she said ICE moved her through six detention facilities, repeatedly placing her in environments where being a transgender woman exposed her to new threats instead of protection.

At the South Texas ICE Processing Center, Ferro Badell said she slept in an open dorm with roughly 70 men. She described being called degrading names and threatened with rape and physical violence. The harassment followed her into ordinary parts of daily life, including meals. At times, she said, she went two or three days without eating because other detainees mocked how she ate and sat or prevented her from sitting at the table.

Her account shows how detention can turn gender identity into a source of constant vulnerability. Housing decisions determine who a trans woman sleeps beside. Staff decisions determine whether her name and identity are recognized. Medical decisions determine whether treatment she was already receiving continues. When those systems fail at the same time, the harm is not confined to one confrontation or one policy. It enters nearly every part of custody.

Camila Toro de Paula came to the United States expecting something different. The 25-year-old transgender woman said she believed she was entering a country where laws protecting trans women would matter. In New York, she found doctors, began hormone treatment and described finally feeling cared for and respected.

ICE detention reversed that experience. Toro de Paula has spent more than a year in a facility for men while pursuing an asylum claim. She described threats and assault inside custody and said the hormone therapy that had become part of her medical care was interrupted. Other transgender women held in ICE facilities have reported similar abrupt losses of hormone treatment, including severe physical changes and worsening psychological distress.

For a trans woman already receiving hormone therapy, the interruption is not merely administrative. It can destabilize physical and mental health, intensify dysphoria and deepen the trauma of confinement. For women who had already established that medical care before detention, entering ICE custody meant treatment they were receiving outside could suddenly be interrupted while the physical and psychological consequences remained theirs to endure.

Irene Flores Mendoza’s account shows another way detention can deepen harm. According to legal filings cited in reporting on her case, she has post-traumatic stress disorder and depression connected to violence she experienced in El Salvador because she is transgender. In ICE custody, she said she was nevertheless kept in isolation for months.

Flores Mendoza described being denied hormones and gender-affirming items while staff refused to recognize her as Irene. At an earlier transgender housing unit in Colorado, she said she was treated as a woman. At the South Texas facility where she was later held, she said staff called her by her previous name, told her she was a man and threatened punishment if she used makeup.

The isolation compounded those injuries. Flores Mendoza said prolonged segregation contributed to severe psychological deterioration, including seeing shadows, hearing voices and experiencing delirium. Detention officials may use isolation to separate transgender detainees from potential attackers, but for someone already living with trauma and depression, removal from a dangerous dorm does not become meaningful protection when the alternative is months of psychological deterioration in segregation.

Mia described the same institutional control reaching into identity itself. She said her Real ID reflected her current name and identified her as female, yet ICE personnel continued using her previous name. She also described being transported with restraints around her arms, waist and legs, an experience she said left her feeling humiliated and dehumanized.

Taken together, these accounts show different versions of the same failure: women entering ICE custody and losing control over where they sleep, whether their medical treatment continues, how staff address them and what happens when they report that detention itself has become unsafe.

ICE previously maintained transgender-specific guidance that recognized many of those vulnerabilities. Earlier standards included individualized housing considerations, continued access to hormone therapy for people already receiving it and specialized housing options intended to reduce exposure to violence. Those protections did not make ICE detention safe; lawsuits, complaints and reporting documented medical neglect, discrimination and excessive isolation even under the earlier framework. But the standards at least acknowledged that transgender detainees faced specific risks that could not be addressed by treating them as interchangeable with everyone else in custody.

That framework has been stripped back as ICE detention has expanded. Transgender-specific guidance disappeared from the Department of Homeland Security website after Donald Trump returned to office, while the administration adopted a broader policy of detaining far more immigrants and limiting the discretion that had previously allowed some vulnerable people to remain outside detention while their cases proceeded.

For trans asylum seekers, that shift carries an especially severe consequence. Many have already fled countries where they experienced police violence, gang violence, sexual abuse or persecution tied directly to their gender identity. Placing them into detention environments where they again face threats, identity erasure, medical deprivation or isolation can reproduce the same conditions they were trying to escape.

Separate civil-rights complaints from the South Louisiana ICE Processing Center show that similar allegations were being raised elsewhere in the detention system. Different transgender and gender-nonconforming detainees alleged that they were selected for an unauthorized overnight work crew, subjected to gender-based taunting and sexual harassment, required to work without adequate protective equipment and exposed to retaliation and medical neglect.

Those complaints concern different people and different incidents from the experiences described by Ferro Badell, Toro de Paula, Flores Mendoza and Mia. They do not prove what happened in those women’s individual cases. They do show that allegations of anti-trans mistreatment were surfacing at another ICE facility during the same broader period, widening the accountability question beyond a single detention center or one group of staff.

For detainees, the distinction between a federal agency and a private contractor does not change who controls the conditions of their confinement. GEO Group operates facilities identified in the reporting, while LaSalle Corrections operates the Louisiana facility where Mia was detained. Housing assignments, access to medical care, staff treatment and disciplinary practices are experienced through those facilities, making contractor conduct part of the accountability record surrounding the harm the women described.

DHS has denied that ICE detention conditions are inhumane and has defended the administration’s refusal to pay for hormone therapy for people in immigration custody. Contractors have also disputed allegations of abuse and pointed to policies requiring misconduct to be reported and investigated. Those official responses now sit beside a record of transgender women describing rape threats, interrupted medical care, prolonged isolation, misgendering and psychological deterioration across multiple facilities, along with separate complaints alleging related anti-trans harm elsewhere in the detention network.

Ferro Badell was deported to Uruguay in August and, according to a friend cited in the reporting, was later being held there while awaiting removal to Argentina. Toro de Paula, Flores Mendoza and other transgender detainees remain part of a system where basic decisions about housing, healthcare and identity recognition can determine whether custody becomes another site of harm.

For trans women who entered the United States seeking safety, that is the unresolved consequence at the center of the record: detention did not merely restrict their movement. In the accounts they gave, it exposed them again to the threats, deprivation and loss of control they had already spent years trying to survive.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to Trans United to help sustain independent reporting that documents these cases, follows the systems responsible, and keeps trans people at the center of the record.

Upgrade

Mariposa was about 35 when she was fatally attacked on September 7, 2026, in the San Nicolás sector of Cali, Colombia, near Calle 24 and Carrera 8. Authorities opened a homicide investigation after she died from wounds caused by a bladed weapon. The person responsible has not been publicly identified, and investigators have not established a motive.

Her killing did not begin as an unexplained act of violence in the public record. Friends told local media that Mariposa had spoken about threats to her safety before the attack and had warned authorities that her life was in danger. According to those accounts, she sought help but did not receive protection before she was killed.

Those reported warnings create an accountability question that reaches beyond identifying whoever carried out the fatal attack. If Mariposa repeatedly told authorities that she feared for her life, the response to those warnings matters: what information was received, whether her concerns were formally recorded, what action was considered, and whether any protective measure followed. Those questions remain unresolved in the reporting available so far.

🎥 Video report on Mariposa’s killing.

Mariposa had ties to the Matía Mulumba neighborhood in Buenaventura, where people knew her before her death became part of a homicide investigation in another city. She had a life in that community before news of her death reduced her to the place and manner of her killing.

Local reporting has also referenced an earlier altercation involving another trans woman, reportedly known as Flor. That information remains preliminary. Investigators had not established that the earlier dispute caused Mariposa’s death, identified the other woman as responsible for the killing, or connected the altercation to a confirmed motive.

Mariposa was one of four people killed violently in Cali that day, according to local reporting. That broader toll provides context for the level of lethal violence authorities were confronting, but it does not answer the questions specific to Mariposa’s case. Her killing remains unresolved. The reported warnings also raise a separate question: did authorities know she was in danger before she was killed, and if so, what did they do about it? Mariposa cannot be reduced to another homicide counted in a daily violence total, and the unanswered questions surrounding her case cannot end with whether police eventually identify a suspect.

The investigation must now establish who killed Mariposa and why. The public record must also clarify what authorities knew about the danger she reportedly described and what happened after those warnings were made. Until those questions are answered, the people who knew Mariposa are left not only with her absence, but with an incomplete account of whether the violence that took her life was preceded by opportunities to protect her.

Upgrade to help Trans United keep following Mariposa’s case beyond the first wave of coverage—tracking new records, investigative developments, and any official response that emerges. Paid subscriptions sustain the verification and follow-up needed to keep this reporting active.

Upgrade

Sophie, a trans woman known within Baltimore’s community, was found dead early Thursday in Baltimore’s Charles Village, leaving friends, community members, and advocates mourning while homicide detectives search for answers. Police said officers responded around 1:16 a.m. near North Calvert Street and East 24th Street, where Sophie was pronounced dead at the scene.

Baltimore Safe Haven said Sophie was not a stranger to the community. The organization identified her as a friend and former client, and staff described her death as deeply affecting people who knew her personally. Safe Haven has also launched a GoFundMe to help cover her funeral expenses. The organization is planning a candlelight vigil near the area where she was found.

🎥 WBAL-TV 11 reports from Baltimore Safe Haven as the organization mourns the trans woman killed in Charles Village.

The circumstances surrounding her death remain under investigation. Sources told WBAL that she had been shot in a nearby alley before being found in the intersection, and that her purse was located about two blocks away. Police have not publicly confirmed those details, and the exact sequence of events leading to her death remains unresolved.

Homicide detectives were seen canvassing the neighborhood and asking residents for home-security footage and information. No arrest has been announced, no suspect has been publicly identified, and police have not established a motive.

Police had initially declined to release Sophie’s name, saying they had not yet positively identified the victim. Baltimore Safe Haven has since publicly identified her as Sophie and launched a GoFundMe to help cover her funeral expenses.

The lack of answers has intensified concern within Baltimore’s trans community. People connected to Safe Haven have publicly raised the possibility that anti-trans violence could have played a role, while also acknowledging that investigators have not established that as a motive.

For Trans United, the uncertainty does not make Sophie’s death abstract. Sophie was known and loved within her community, and no one has been identified in connection with her death. The investigation now has to establish what happened to her, who caused her death, and whether the violence she suffered was connected in any way to her being trans.

Sophie’s friends and community are preparing to gather in mourning. They are carrying the loss of someone they knew while waiting for answers about what happened to her, who killed her, and why.

Upgrade to help Trans United keep following this Baltimore case as investigators search for who killed Sophie and new details emerge about what happened in Charles Village.

Paid subscriptions sustain the verification and follow-up needed to keep this reporting active beyond the first wave of coverage

Upgrade

Luan was a 17-year-old trans boy. When authorities recovered his body, injuries to his neck and face, blood, burns and preliminary forensic observations pointed to severe violence before his death.

Firefighters had extinguished flames in the field before Luan was discovered face down and partially undressed. Police documented possible drag marks and tire marks nearby and collected a sandal, necklace and phone-charger cable from the area. Those physical traces became part of the homicide investigation, but the available record did not determine whether Luan died at that location or was brought there afterward.

In the days that followed, Civil Police sought surveillance footage and information about vehicles that may have traveled near the area. Rain had affected portions of the scene, adding another obstacle to efforts to preserve and examine potential evidence. No suspect had emerged in the latest verified reporting.

The injuries around Luan’s neck were described in preliminary reporting as consistent with strangulation or asphyxiation. Possible drag marks raised the prospect that his body had been moved, while the tire marks gave investigators another lead without identifying a particular vehicle or person. The burns were documented, but the available findings did not determine who started the fire, when it began in relation to his death, or whether it was connected to an attempt to conceal evidence.

Before his death, Luan had reportedly been with friends during the overnight hours. What happened between that point and the discovery of his body remains unresolved. Authorities had not announced a motive, and nothing in the verified record established that anti-trans bias drove the killing. His identity is part of who he was; it cannot be converted into a motive without evidence.

Some local coverage misgendered Luan after his death despite reporting that he was trans. That did not cause his killing, but it added another documented harm by failing to represent him accurately in the public record. Trans United identifies him as he lived: Luan, a 17-year-old trans boy.

What remains unresolved is not abstract. No one has been held responsible for the violence that killed Luan, and the record still does not explain what happened during his final hours or whether the evidence recovered from the scene will lead investigators to the person responsible.

Luan’s family and friends are still left without a complete account of what happened to him. Until the person who killed him is identified and the circumstances of his death are fully established, that absence of accountability remains part of what was taken from them.

Upgrade to help Trans United keep reporting beyond the first wave of coverage around Luan’s death—tracking new records, investigative developments, and accountability as they emerge. Paid subscriptions sustain the verification and follow-up required to keep this work active.

Upgrade

Yoisi Villalta had a life before her disappearance became a public record. She was a 36-year-old trans woman from Texistepeque, in Santa Ana Norte, El Salvador, where she made a living selling tortas. LGBTQ organizations remembered her as hardworking and generous, including sharing food with sexual-health brigades carrying out work in the area.

That life was interrupted in late August 2026. Yoisi was reported missing by her family. Salvadoran reporting dates her disappearance report to August 27. Eight days later, her body was found in Tacuba, Ahuachapán. At the time of the reporting reviewed by Trans United, the Policía Nacional Civil had not publicly established her cause of death or classified the case as an intentional homicide.

That unresolved fact matters. Yoisi’s death should not be converted into a murder, hate-crime, or anti-trans killing claim without evidence establishing what happened to her. But uncertainty about how she died does not erase another documented harm surrounding her disappearance: advocates said the search for Yoisi did not use the name by which she lived and was known.

The Federación Salvadoreña LGBTI said the name appearing on Yoisi’s Documento Único de Identidad was used during the search instead. For a missing trans woman, that distinction reaches beyond paperwork. A public search depends on people being able to recognize the person who is missing. When the name circulating through that search does not correspond with the identity her community knows, the divide between a trans person’s lived identity and the state’s record follows her directly into a moment when recognition can matter most.

That divide does not begin with Yoisi. El Salvador still lacks a general legal mechanism allowing trans people to change their name and gender marker on identity documents so those records correspond with their gender identity. A trans person can therefore build a life under one name—in family, work, community and everyday relationships—while official documents continue carrying another. Yoisi’s disappearance brought that structural failure into an immediate human context.

Her community refused to allow the document to become the final word on who she was. After her death, Federación Salvadoreña LGBTI called for Yoisi to be remembered through her life, her work, her generosity and, especially, her name. That insistence returns the record to the woman who existed before headlines about a body being found.

Yoisi worked, fed people, and built a life within her community. She disappeared, and eight days later that community learned she was dead. Those facts deserve to remain visible without speculation replacing what investigators have not publicly established.

They also leave accountability unfinished. The public record reviewed by Trans United still does not answer how Yoisi Villalta died. And the documented handling of her identity during the search leaves a separate question that does not depend on determining her cause of death: why could a trans woman disappear while the system searching for her failed to carry the name by which she actually lived?

Whatever an investigation ultimately establishes about her death, Yoisi Villalta’s name and life belong in the public record on their own terms.

Trans United Fund documents trans deaths, disappearances, and the institutional failures surrounding them so these cases remain visible and accountability does not end with a headline. Supporting this work helps us continue building that record across borders and over time.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to fund Trans United Fund’s independent, victim-centered reporting and help us continue documenting these cases.

Upgrade

Thaiz Andrade Pedrosa had already spent roughly two decades working in healthcare when she finally entered medical school. She had taken a municipal civil-service examination at 17 and went on to work as a health agent in Divinópolis, Minas Gerais. Medicine was not a sudden ambition. It was a goal she pursued while working full days and studying at night, carrying a professional life in healthcare alongside the effort to become a physician.

She decided to pursue medicine in 2013. Years later, she described working from 7 a.m. until 5 p.m. and then studying on her own until 10 or 11 at night. In 2018, she came within six points of securing a place at the Federal University of Minas Gerais. She kept going. The following year, Thaiz moved to Salvador and entered the medical program at the Federal University of Bahia, becoming the first trans woman to study medicine there through the university’s affirmative-action pathway for trans students.

That entry mattered because the barrier was not abstract to Thaiz. She had spent years trying to reach a profession in which trans people remain profoundly underrepresented, without the advantages available to students able to devote their lives exclusively to preparing for competitive admissions. She defended affirmative action as a response to those unequal starting conditions, pointing directly to her own experience of working all day while preparing for medical school at night.

Her arrival at the Faculty of Medicine also confronted assumptions about who was expected to occupy that space. Thaiz recalled asking a doorman for directions on her first day and being questioned about why she was there because, she said, he had never seen anyone like her. Her answer was unequivocal: she told him to get used to seeing her because she intended to remain there for six years. The exchange exposed something her admission alone could not erase: gaining access to an institution did not automatically produce belonging inside it.

Thaiz did more than occupy the place she had fought to reach. During her studies, she helped found Transufba, a collective organized by trans students to push for stronger affirmative-action policies and, crucially, the conditions necessary for trans students to remain at the university after admission. Her work made the distinction between opening a door and making it possible for people to survive on the other side of it.

UFBA records reinforce that permanence was material, not rhetorical. University assistance records identify Thaiz as a medical student and list forms of student support connected to food, transportation and trans students. Her presence in medicine therefore sits inside a larger public record about what access requires: admission creates an opportunity, but students still need the resources that allow them to continue their education.

Medicine also changed how Thaiz thought about the care she wanted to provide. She initially planned to specialize in endocrinology, with reporting after her death describing her ambition to care for trans patients, including people undergoing hormone therapy. But her thinking expanded during medical school. Thaiz argued that a trans patient should not have every medical need reduced to being trans; clinicians needed to treat the whole person.

That principle placed her trajectory beyond the symbolism of being a historic first. Thaiz was moving from years of frontline health work into medical training while imagining what care could look like when trans people were not merely patients navigating healthcare institutions, but physicians helping shape the care delivered inside them. The affirmative-action pathway gave her access to medical school. What she intended to build from that access was her own.

Thaiz died in Salvador on September 3, 2026. She was 44. The Faculty of Medicine and its academic directory publicly mourned her death, and the cause has not been disclosed. Nothing in the available record establishes a cause, and her death should not be converted into a mechanism the evidence does not support.

Her death cut short a medical career built on an unusually long path to the profession. Before entering UFBA, Thaiz had already devoted approximately two decades to public health. At the university, she helped create Transufba and pushed beyond admission toward the conditions trans students needed to remain. As a future physician, she intended to carry that experience into patient care.

Thaiz reached medicine after years of working toward a place where people like her were rarely represented. She did not reach it simply to become its historic first. She was preparing to become a doctor, helping make the university more navigable for those coming behind her and imagining healthcare in which trans people could stand on both sides of the examination room. She died at 44 before that future could be completed. The life she had already built shows precisely what was lost.

Trans people should not have to become exceptional before their lives are considered worth documenting. Trans United Fund builds a durable public record of trans lives while exposing the conditions that shape whether trans people can access opportunity, remain there, and build lives on their own terms.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to support Trans United Fund and sustain independent, victim-centered reporting.

Upgrade

Mousumi was known in Chattogram as a Guru Ma and a leader within the local hijra community. At 52, she had become known through the leadership role she carried among other hijra people in Chattogram. Her murder took a recognized community leader from the people who knew her and left members of that community demanding justice in her name.

On Sept. 5, Mousumi was found dead inside her home in the Ambagan Railway Colony area of Chattogram. Police reported marks around her neck and blood around her mouth. Her father filed a murder case with Khulshi Police Station, turning the search for the person who killed her into a formal criminal investigation.

Investigators say CCTV footage became the key piece of evidence that led them to Md Momin, also known as Sheikh Rony, 34. Police say the footage showed him entering Mousumi’s room at approximately 1:14 a.m. and leaving at about 3:52 a.m. Investigators used that record to identify and arrest him.

Police say Momin confessed during questioning to strangling Mousumi with a nylon strap. That reported confession places the killing itself at the center of the case: Mousumi was strangled inside her own home, and investigators say the man they identified through surveillance footage admitted that he killed her.

Momin also gave investigators an account of what happened before Mousumi was killed. Police say he described an argument involving money and a sexual relationship. That explanation remains his account to investigators. It does not replace the established harm at the center of the case: Mousumi was killed, police identified a suspect through CCTV evidence, and investigators say that suspect confessed to strangling her.

Some members of the hijra community have separately raised fears that extremists were responsible for Mousumi’s death. That claim remains distinct from the police case now centered on Momin. The criminal investigation has moved forward on the evidence police say connects him directly to Mousumi’s killing.

For the people who knew Mousumi, the case is not only about identifying who killed her. Community members gathered after her death and demanded justice for a woman they knew as Guru Ma. That role matters because Mousumi was recognized as a leader within Chattogram’s hijra community before her death.

Mousumi’s father has filed a murder case, police have arrested Momin, and investigators say he confessed to strangling her. Those developments belong to the accountability record, but the human center remains the woman who was killed inside her home and the hijra community now forced to continue without one of its leaders.

Mousumi’s name should remain attached to more than the details of how she died. She was a transgender community leader, a Guru Ma, and a woman whose death left members of Chattogram’s hijra community demanding that the man police say confessed to killing her be held accountable.

The arrest is one step in the accountability process for Mousumi’s murder. Trans United will keep documenting what happens next in her case while supporting transgender people facing violence and instability.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to support Trans United’s reporting and direct financial support for transgender people.

Upgrade

Vincent Anthony Siqueiros, 42, and Cameron Davis Capara, 33, were killed just after 12:30 a.m. outside Venture-N, a longtime gay bar in Tucson. They died in the parking lot of a place that had served LGBTQ people for decades as a gathering point where friendships and chosen families were built.

Vincent was remembered as someone who made people feel included almost immediately. Friends described him as friendly, kindhearted, prepared, and eager to pull new people into the circle around him. One close friend said Vincent could make a bad day better simply by being there.

Cameron was remembered by his mother as deeply passionate about social justice and helping others. After his death, the size of the community around him became visible through the people who gathered, shared memories, and added to the memorial outside Venture-N.

The men were not killed in a personal dispute that was later labeled a hate crime. Tucson police say the shooter had no apparent connection to either victim, and investigators recovered evidence showing the shooting was a targeted attack motivated by hatred toward the LGBTQIA+ community.

That distinction changes the meaning of the attack. Police found no apparent relationship linking Vincent or Cameron to the shooter. The evidence instead points toward the LGBTQ community itself as the object of the hatred behind the killings.

Venture-N had been part of Tucson’s LGBTQ community since the early 1980s. Regulars described it as one of the places where people could gather, build friendships and chosen families, celebrate, and heal. Vincent and Cameron were killed at the edge of a space carrying decades of that history.

Investigators also recovered a note containing the names of several other LGBTQIA+-associated businesses. Police later said additional evidence indicated the shooter acted alone and confirmed the Venture-N shooting was motivated by anti-LGBTQ hate. The record does not establish that every business named was a confirmed future attack target, but the discovery extended the threat beyond a single location and led police to contact the businesses identified.

The killings therefore reached beyond what happened in one parking lot. Vincent and Cameron were dead, a longstanding LGBTQ gathering place had become the site of targeted anti-LGBTQ violence, and evidence recovered afterward connected the attacker’s hatred to other businesses associated with the same community.

Flowers, candles, photographs, and handwritten messages soon covered part of the wall outside Venture-N as people came to remember Vincent and Cameron. The memorial kept the focus where it belonged: on two lives taken in an attack aimed at the community around them.

The accountability question now reaches beyond identifying who pulled the trigger. Police have established the anti-LGBTQ motive. What remains is the reality Tucson’s queer community has been forced to confront: Vincent and Cameron were killed where LGBTQ people had gathered for decades, and the evidence recovered afterward showed that the hatred behind their deaths was not confined to them alone.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to help support Trans United Fund’s reporting, public-record accountability, and documentation of anti-LGBTQ violence targeting queer people and the spaces built for their safety.

Upgrade

Trans students are the people placed at risk by the Trump Justice Department’s new lawsuit against Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools. Filed September 1, the case uses the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment to challenge district guidance that allows schools to handle disclosure of a student’s gender identity, name, pronouns, or transition-related information case by case. The federal government is asking a court to expand parental access to information that can expose a trans student’s identity before that student has chosen to disclose it at home.

The lawsuit turns federal education-record law into a mechanism for forced disclosure pressure. DOJ argues that parents are entitled to inspect records connected to a student’s gender identity and that the district’s guidance unlawfully interferes with those rights. It is also asking the court to stop the district from using the challenged transgender guidance. If the government succeeds, schools could face stronger federal pressure to provide gender-identity information to parents rather than preserve individualized decisions about when disclosure is safe or appropriate for a student.

Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools has rejected the government’s characterization of its practices. The district says it complies with federal law, and reporting on the guidance shows that parental involvement is handled individually rather than through an automatic rule requiring schools to conceal information. The district has also said the guidance is not mandatory board policy. No court has found that the district violated FERPA or PPRA.

That distinction matters because DOJ has framed the case around what it calls “secret gender transitions,” language that turns trans students into the problem and school confidentiality into the alleged misconduct. The underlying mechanism is more concrete: the government wants broader parental access to records that can reveal a student’s gender identity, and it is using federal enforcement power to attack practices that leave room for schools to consider each student’s circumstances.

For trans students, control over disclosure is not an abstract administrative issue. A student who uses a different name or pronouns at school may not be ready, willing, or safe to disclose that identity at home. A federal rule that pushes schools toward disclosure can remove that choice from the student and place the decision in the hands of institutions and adults around them. The harm is the loss of privacy and control over deeply personal identity information.

The Kansas lawsuit also appears to be part of a broader federal strategy rather than an isolated dispute. The Education Department had already pressured multiple Kansas school districts over its interpretation of FERPA before DOJ filed this case, including districts beyond Kansas City, Kansas. A court victory for the administration could give federal agencies a stronger model for using education-record law against other districts that allow case-by-case handling of trans students’ information.

The stakes extend beyond one school system because this lawsuit could establish a federal template for challenging similar protections elsewhere. A ruling for DOJ could give the administration a stronger legal tool to pressure other districts that preserve case-by-case confidentiality for trans students.

The Trump Justice Department has chosen to make trans students’ records a new target of federal enforcement. Until the court decides how far FERPA and PPRA can be stretched in this context, the central harm remains clear: the government is trying to expand access to information that can out trans students and take decisions about disclosure out of their hands.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to help support Trans United Fund’s reporting, public-record accountability, and direct support for trans people facing forced disclosure, violence, displacement, and crisis.

Upgrade

Sources: U.S. Department of Justice, Associated Press, Reuters, Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools.

Madonna Isabella Webber Saldanha da Silva was 46 years old, a trans woman living in Caxias do Sul, in Brazil’s southern state of Rio Grande do Sul. On the night of August 31, she was found dead inside a Citroën in the Jardelino Ramos neighborhood after being shot. Preliminary forensic reporting documented two gunshot wounds, and the homicide investigation remained open as authorities worked to determine who killed her and why.

What is established is already enough to define the harm. Madonna was found in the driver’s seat of the vehicle, and no suspect had been publicly identified or arrested in the reporting reviewed for this article. Investigators had also not established a motive. Additional details reported locally, including information about the weapon and the possibility that another person had been inside the vehicle, remained preliminary and did not change the central fact of the case: Madonna was shot and killed, and the person responsible had not yet been identified.

Her trans identity belongs in that record because it was part of who she was, not because investigators have established that it was the reason she was killed. No verified evidence reviewed for this article establishes an anti-trans motive or hate-crime classification. Preserving Madonna’s identity does not require speculation about motive, and uncertainty about motive does not erase the fact that she was a trans woman whose killing now enters the broader record of lethal violence against trans people in Brazil.

That wider context matters without replacing Madonna herself. Trans-led organizations in Brazil have documented lethal violence against trans people for years, particularly violence affecting trans women and travestis. That history shows why Madonna’s death cannot be allowed to disappear into a brief crime report, but her killing remains its own case, with its own facts, its own unanswered questions, and its own demand for accountability.

Investigators had not publicly established who fired the shots, whether Madonna knew the person responsible, what happened immediately before the shooting, or what motive drove the killing. Those questions remain central. Until they are answered, the record must stay focused on what is known: Madonna was shot and killed, the person responsible had not been identified, and the circumstances surrounding her death remained under investigation.

Madonna’s burial was scheduled for September 2 at the Cemitério Municipal de Caxias do Sul while the investigation remained active. The people who knew her were therefore preparing to bury her before the public had answers about who killed her or why. Her death should remain visible beyond the first reports and beyond the crime scene itself, because Madonna Isabella Webber Saldanha da Silva was a 46-year-old trans woman who was shot and killed, and her death still demands accountability.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to help support Trans United Fund’s reporting, public-record accountability, and direct support for trans people facing violence, displacement, and crisis.

Upgrade

Sources: Leouve, NB Notícias, ANTRA.

A transgender woman was attacked and sexually assaulted at Goodspeed Family Pier in Madison, Wisconsin, in the early morning of August 29. Police arrested two men after the violence, with the department recording tentative allegations that include second-degree sexual assault with use of force, strangulation and suffocation, battery, and false imprisonment.

The police response began after a bystander reported a disturbance at approximately 4:10 a.m. University of Wisconsin–Madison officers arrived at the Lake Mendota pier and opened the investigation that became case 26-1336. The woman’s name has not been made public.

Police identified the arrested men as Yorfred H. Marcano Gutierrez, 31, and Arturo R. Santos Albujas, 27. Investigators said the woman had met the men at a bar earlier before they walked to the pier, where the violence occurred as she tried to leave.

Her control over her own body and movement was breached simultaneously, placing multiple forms of coercion within the same episode of violence.

Wisconsin law adds a separate accountability issue for trans people targeted because of who they are. The state’s hate-crime penalty enhancer allows increased punishment when someone intentionally selects a victim because of race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. Gender identity and gender expression are absent from that list.

For trans people deliberately targeted because they are trans, that omission means Wisconsin’s hate-crime law provides no explicit gender-identity basis for enhanced punishment.

For the woman who survived at Goodspeed Family Pier, the arrests begin rather than complete the question of accountability. The men accused of attacking her now face that demand because of what police documented against her that morning.

Trans United Fund preserves the public record of violence against trans people and the systems that shape their safety and survival. Upgrade to a paid subscription to support a trans-led infrastructure built around protection, accountability and direct community support.

Upgrade

Kayra Kamilly was 33 years old when her body was found abandoned in a vacant lot in Guarujá, Brazil, on the coast of São Paulo state. Local reporting says she had suffered severe violence, including a head injury described in the police record as compatible with crushing. By the time Kayra was discovered on Aug. 27, her body was already in an advanced state of decomposition, leaving investigators to reconstruct a killing that had occurred before anyone found her.

Kayra was found in the Jardim Três Marias area, near Rua Cláudio dos Santos and Rua Azor Gomes de Almeida. Police and forensic teams were called to the scene, and her body was removed for examination while investigators began trying to reconstruct what had happened before she was left there. Authorities requested necroscopic, fingerprint and toxicological examinations as part of the investigation.

The condition in which Kayra was found makes the period before her discovery central to the investigation. Authorities still have to determine when she died, what caused her death, where the fatal violence occurred and whether the vacant lot was where she was killed or where her body was later abandoned. Those answers matter because Kayra entered the public record only after her death, leaving investigators to reconstruct what happened from the evidence that remained.

Local police registered Kayra’s death as a homicide and referred the investigation to the 3rd Homicide Division of Deic. As of the latest local reporting, authorities had not publicly identified or arrested a suspect. The case therefore remains open at its most basic level: investigators still have to establish who killed Kayra and what happened before her body was found.

🎥 Scene in Guarujá, Brazil, where Kayra Kamilly was found dead.

The street where Kayra was found appears ordinary in daylight, lined with homes, trees, utility poles and a long wall bordering the property. Behind that location is a 33-year-old trans woman whose life ended violently and whose final hours remain largely unknown to the public.

Kayra’s identity matters in how her death is recorded. She was a trans woman, and the severe violence done to her, the condition in which her body was found and the vacant lot where she was left are part of the homicide record, not the totality of who she was. Preserving her name, gender and humanity while investigators pursue accountability is part of what is still owed to her.

Her death also sits inside a broader reality in Brazil, where trans women and travestis remain disproportionately exposed to lethal violence. ANTRA documented 80 murders of trans people and travestis in 2025 and has warned that gaps in official records leave civil-society groups carrying much of the burden of preserving these deaths. Trans United has documented a related public-record danger in the United States, where the removal or weakening of trans identity in official records can make violence harder to track and preserve. Kayra’s killing belongs inside that wider pattern without being reduced to it.

The absence of a publicly identified suspect leaves the central facts of Kayra’s death unresolved. Investigators still have to determine who inflicted the fatal violence, reconstruct what happened before her body was found and establish how she came to be left in the vacant lot. Until those questions are answered, the homicide remains unfinished in the public record and accountability remains incomplete.

Kayra Kamilly deserves to remain at the center of that record as more than a homicide victim or crime-scene description. Accountability now means identifying who killed her, establishing what happened before her death and preserving the name and identity of the 33-year-old trans woman whose life was violently taken in Guarujá.

Upgrade to a paid subscription. Kayra Kamilly was 33 years old when she was found dead with signs of severe violence in Guarujá. Your support helps fund Trans United reporting and direct support for trans people facing violence, displacement, and threats to their safety.

Upgrade

The Trump administration has taken ordinary support for trans people and pushed it into the language of terrorism. Through the Department of Health and Human Services, the administration commissioned an anti-trans study that treats respecting a trans person’s identity, using their name and pronouns, supporting trans children and accepting gender-affirming medical guidance as material to be measured against political violence. The threat comes from a federal government using its power to manufacture a case for treating care, recognition and solidarity with trans people as dangerous.

HHS released the study on Aug. 26 under the title Where the Clinic Meets the Movement: Does Gender Ideology Arm Left-Wing Authoritarian Psychology? Researchers surveyed 1,208 adults and created what they called a “Clinical Gender Affirmation Scale.” That scale turned positions involving trans identity, names and pronouns, parental support and gender-affirming guidance into variables that could then be compared with the study’s measures of political violence and what HHS calls “left-wing authoritarianism.”

That design is where the anti-trans harm begins. The administration did not simply attack a medical procedure or another federal policy. It took the relationships that allow trans people to live with dignity — a parent recognizing their child, a doctor providing care, a community respecting someone’s identity — and placed those relationships inside a government-produced danger framework. HHS gave anti-trans hostility the appearance of federal research and created language capable of traveling far beyond the pages of one study.

The study becomes even more dangerous because the administration has already moved anti-trans rhetoric into the territory of counterterrorism. Federal officials have used language about so-called “transgender ideology” while discussing ideological violence and extremism. HHS has now added a commissioned study that places support for trans people beside political violence, giving the administration another tool to deepen a terrorism narrative around trans communities and the people who refuse to abandon them.

For trans people, that escalation reaches into the relationships that keep them alive, housed, cared for and connected to the world around them. Parents who protect trans children, doctors who continue providing care, advocates who challenge discriminatory laws and organizations that defend trans rights all become vulnerable when the government begins treating support itself as suspicious. The administration’s attack is therefore designed to reach beyond individual trans people and pressure the networks of care surrounding them.

That is what makes the terrorism frame especially dangerous. Terrorism and national-security systems carry powers that ordinary political attacks do not: surveillance, intelligence gathering, investigations, organizational scrutiny, criminal accusations and prison sentences measured in years. By placing trans affirmation inside a political-violence framework, the Trump administration is building language that anti-trans lawmakers, agencies and prosecutors can use to demand harsher treatment of trans people and their supporters.

The study also fits a broader pattern of anti-trans government cruelty that has already moved from rhetoric into policy. Federal power has been used against gender-affirming healthcare, trans-inclusive programs, military service and public recognition. Government agencies have attempted to remove trans identity from systems that once acknowledged it, while healthcare restrictions have made treatment harder to reach. Those attacks show what happens when anti-trans ideology acquires administrative power: people lose care, recognition, protection and access to institutions they previously relied upon.

The HHS study adds another weapon to that machinery. Previous attacks sought to erase trans people or exclude them from healthcare and public life; this one creates a mechanism for casting support for them as part of a political threat. It gives officials material they can invoke when claiming that parents, clinicians, advocates or organizations standing beside trans people deserve greater suspicion.

That danger can move directly into legislation and enforcement when officials use the study to justify new restrictions, increased scrutiny of advocacy organizations or harsher treatment of groups defending trans people. Once anti-trans hostility acquires institutional form, it no longer depends only on speeches or campaign slogans; it can move through agencies, investigations and prosecutions backed by government authority.

The cruelty of that progression becomes clearest in the relationships trans people depend on every day. Parents should be able to recognize and protect their trans children, patients should be able to receive care from doctors who refuse to abandon them, and trans adults should be able to rely on friends, advocates and community organizations without the government turning those relationships into material for suspicion.

This anti-trans federally commissioned study attacks those ordinary forms of human support by surrounding them with the language of political violence. It creates another weapon against the very people who make trans survival possible, while allowing the administration to push its anti-trans campaign deeper into the territory of extremism, national security and terrorism.

The administration’s earlier anti-trans rhetoric has repeatedly hardened into regulations, erasure policies and institutional exclusion, showing how hostile language can acquire the force of government action. The danger of this study is that the administration is laying groundwork for another escalation: turning support for trans people into something officials can portray as a security threat and use to rationalize surveillance, investigation, prosecution or imprisonment.

Trans people are the victims of that machinery. They are trying to live, receive healthcare, remain connected to their families and move through public life while their own government expands an anti-trans campaign around them. The Trump administration is the force expanding that danger, and HHS has now supplied it with an anti-trans federal study capable of turning care into suspicion, solidarity into a target and support for trans people into material for a terrorism framework.

The Trump administration is expanding its anti-trans campaign from attacks on healthcare and recognition into a federal threat framework that can place trans people and the people who support them at greater risk. Upgrade to a paid subscription. Your support helps fund Trans United reporting and direct support for trans people facing violence, displacement, and threats to their safety.

Upgrade

Log Cabin Republicans spent more than a decade including transgender rights in the advocacy mission it presented publicly. In 2026, its board ended that commitment and repositioned the organization around lesbian, gay and bisexual advocacy.

The reversal dismantles a commitment adopted in 2015. Trans people can still join Log Cabin Republicans, but the organization will no longer advocate nationally for transgender causes, leaving membership open while withdrawing the political representation that had previously accompanied it.

Board president Ross Hemminger defended the decision using the phrase “radical gender ideology” while invoking minors, schools, sports and gender-affirming care. That rhetoric became part of the organization’s explanation for abandoning transgender advocacy rather than merely an internal branding change.

The organization also removed transgender references from portions of its public-facing website and began describing itself as an “LGB advocacy organization.” The change places transgender rights outside the national work Log Cabin Republicans has chosen to pursue.

That withdrawal comes during a broader federal campaign against transgender rights. The Trump administration has moved to define sex federally as male or female and has pressured schools and other institutions over policies involving transgender people, making the loss of an advocacy organization materially consequential for a population already facing government action against its rights.

Trans United describes the decision as institutional abandonment: an organization that had spent eleven years claiming transgender advocacy as part of its mission has withdrawn that commitment while anti-trans government action is intensifying.

The practical consequence is a narrower political coalition willing to advocate for transgender people inside conservative politics. Log Cabin Republicans still offers trans people membership, but it has removed their rights from the national advocacy agenda it carries into that political space.

Trans United tracks the institutions and political decisions shaping trans people’s rights, safety, and public record.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to support source review, case tracking, and follow-up reporting on anti-trans policy and institutional action ↓

Upgrade

Maryna Colucci de Jesus worked with children before her name entered a homicide investigation. The 34-year-old trans woman was an early-childhood teacher and child-protection councilor in Jacuí, a municipality in Minas Gerais, Brazil, where her public work placed her alongside children and adolescents facing threats or violations of their rights.

She disappeared on Aug. 21 after leaving her parents’ home. Her family searched for her, and the municipality circulated an appeal asking for information about her whereabouts. Four days later, investigators found Maryna dead in a rural area near Jacuí.

A serving Minas Gerais Military Police sergeant, José Sérgio de Oliveira, later admitted that he fired the shots that killed her and concealed her body. He also provided information that led investigators to where Maryna had been buried. A court ordered him held in preventive detention while the investigation continues.

The forensic evidence documented six gunshot wounds to Maryna’s head. Investigators found her in a grave estimated at roughly 1.5 to 2 meters deep.

Oliveira told authorities that Maryna attacked him with a knife. Investigators recovered a knife, but Civil Police investigator Marcos Pimenta has publicly questioned whether Oliveira’s account fits the physical evidence, citing the absence of injuries on Oliveira and the number and location of Maryna’s gunshot wounds.

In ordering Oliveira’s preventive detention, Judge Elisandra Alice dos Santos Camilo described the shots as having been fired directly toward Maryna’s face and said she had no opportunity to defend herself.

Investigators are also examining the relationship between Maryna and Oliveira. After her disappearance, relatives found diaries, photographs and messages indicating an intimate relationship between them. Those materials are now part of the investigation into what happened before Maryna was killed and whether the relationship played any role in her death.

The Minas Gerais Civil Police are investigating Maryna’s killing as feminicide and the concealment of her body as a separate offense. Police are also examining whether anyone helped move or bury her. Investigators have questioned whether one person could have handled the concealment alone given the circumstances of the grave, but the inquiry into possible assistance remains open.

Because Oliveira is a serving Military Police sergeant, his admitted conduct has also triggered an administrative proceeding within the force while Civil Police continue investigating Maryna’s killing.

The next test is accountability. Trans United will keep tracking what investigators establish, how Maryna Colucci de Jesus’s case moves through the courts, and whether the official record answers the questions that remain.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to support Trans United’s case tracking, source review and follow-up reporting.

Upgrade

Sources

Folha de S.Paulo — Maryna Colucci de Jesus found dead in rural Minas Gerais

O Tempo — Police sergeant admits killing Maryna; preventive detention ordered

O Tempo — Police investigate whether others helped conceal Maryna’s body

Estado de Minas — Police sergeant held preventively in Maryna investigation

Observatório G — Relationship becomes part of Maryna investigation

Laura is the protected name used by Asociación Silueta X and Observatorio Runa Sipiy for a trans woman killed in Quevedo, Ecuador. The organizations documented her gender identity while her full forensic identification remained pending.

Her remains were found Aug. 14 in two locations in the Venus del Río Quevedo area of Los Ríos province. Runa Sipiy reported that Laura had been killed, decapitated and dismembered. The unresolved record extends beyond that violence: her full identity, who killed her, the motive and the extent of the state’s investigative response remained unanswered.

Before those answers existed, trans organizations were already working to keep Laura’s identity from disappearing behind descriptions of unidentified human remains. They also called for her full identification and for her remains to be returned with dignity.

Trans United describes that gap as erasure after death: Laura entered the public record as unidentified remains while trans organizations worked to preserve her gender and humanity before her full forensic identity had been established.

Laura’s case also connects to a documentation pattern Trans United has previously tracked: when gender identity disappears from official records or early reporting, a trans person can become harder to find, count and connect to the broader record of violence against trans people. In Laura’s case, the first public record centered unidentified remains; trans organizations later supplied the protected name and gender identity needed to restore a trans woman to that record.

The accountability process was unclear from the beginning. Local reporting said police responded to the discovery and began investigating the remains. But Runa Sipiy reported that, as of Aug. 15, no formal Fiscalía investigative process had been opened in Laura’s case and demanded that Ecuador’s Fiscalía assign a prosecutor. The distinction matters: authorities were examining the scene, while trans-rights organizations were simultaneously asking for a formal prosecutorial case capable of moving from identification toward responsibility.

By Aug. 19, those questions remained unresolved. Diane Rodríguez of Silueta X told Radio Pichincha that there was still insufficient public information about an official investigation, possible detainees or the circumstances surrounding Laura’s killing. The Runa Sipiy alert had already called for identification, investigation and arrests; advocates were still asking what authorities had established.

No perpetrator has been publicly identified in Laura’s killing. No anti-trans motive has been publicly established. Silueta X and Runa Sipiy have preliminarily classified Laura’s killing as a transfemicide and called for investigators to examine whether hatred or discrimination connected to her gender identity played a role. Rodríguez has also emphasized that determining that motive is the responsibility of investigators. Laura’s trans identity belongs in the record because community organizations identified her as a trans woman.

Her death also sits inside a wider record of lethal violence documented by Ecuador’s trans community. Silueta X said its monitoring had recorded 18 killings of LGBTIQ+ people in Ecuador during 2026 as of Aug. 19, including 16 trans women. Those are the organization’s community-monitoring figures, not official national statistics, and Rodríguez has criticized the absence of consolidated official data capable of showing patterns and accountability gaps affecting LGBTIQ+ people.

The consequences of that violence extend beyond the people already killed. Rodríguez said some trans people in Ecuador are changing how they work, limiting their exposure in public spaces and even considering leaving the country because of fear. That broader climate explains why an unresolved killing of a trans woman carries consequences far beyond one police file.

Laura should not remain only a protected name attached to an unresolved killing. Trans organizations began demanding full identification, notification of her family or support network, dignified return of her remains and a formal investigation. Those demands now sit alongside the unanswered questions of who killed her and why.

The public record began with remains found in two places. It now identifies Laura as a trans woman whose protected name was preserved by community organizations while the circumstances of her killing and responsibility for her death remain unresolved. Accountability requires that the record move beyond identifying what was found in Quevedo and establish what happened to Laura, who was responsible, and whether her gender identity played any role in her killing.

Laura was killed in Quevedo, and trans-rights organizations intervened to keep her identity visible while demanding full identification, a formal investigation and accountability for her death.

Support Trans United as we preserve Laura’s name in the public record and continue documenting the unanswered questions surrounding her killing and the demand for accountability.

Upgrade to a paid subscription ↓

Upgrade

TRANS UNITED — ERASURE PATTERN NOTE

Laura’s case extends an erasure pattern Trans United has documented across multiple trans deaths: the violence happens first, then the public record struggles to preserve who the trans person actually was.

In the United States, that has appeared through deleted gender-identity data, police misgendering, deadnaming, thin homicide coverage, and public systems that leave families and communities to reconstruct the record. Trans United documented that pattern in its broader investigation into disappearing gender-identity data, and again in the deaths of Asia Williams, Paris, Jade Roberts, and Jayla McGee.

Laura shows that the outcome can extend across borders without assuming the same institutional cause. In Quevedo, her death entered the public record through unidentified remains before trans organizations restored a protected name and her identity as a trans woman. Different systems may produce the gap differently, but the consequence is recognizable: when official records fail to preserve trans identity, trans deaths become harder to find, count, connect, and remember.

Related Trans United records

The Trump Administration’s Erasure of Harm Against Trans People from the Internet

A Black Trans Woman Was Shot To Death In Baltimore. Her Name Was Asia Williams

Unapologetically Paris: A Young Black Trans Texan Was Killed — Then the Record Struggled to Name Them

Jade Roberts, a Black Trans Texan, Was Found Wrapped in a Tarp. Five Months Later, the Silence Is the Story.

Black Trans Teen Jayla McGee’s Loved Ones Say She Was Shot and Killed. The Public Record Is Nearly Silent.

A young trans person in Massachusetts can live in a state where gender-affirming care remains legal, protected by state policy, defended in court, and supported with public money — and still lose access to the provider they depended on.

That contradiction is already unfolding across Massachusetts. Fenway Health, Baystate Health, and Outer Cape Health Services have halted or restricted gender-affirming care for patients 18 and younger amid escalating federal pressure. State officials continue to say the care is lawful, but the clinics pulling back show why legal protection alone does not guarantee that treatment will remain available when a patient needs it.

For trans youth and their families, that gap is immediate. A state can legally protect access to treatment, but that protection becomes harder to exercise when clinics narrow programs, providers disappear, or families must begin searching again for someone willing and able to continue care. The question stops being whether treatment is technically permitted and becomes much more basic: where can a patient actually receive it?

Massachusetts has repeatedly tried to answer the federal attack with legal protection. Attorney General Andrea Campbell has reaffirmed that gender-affirming care for minors remains lawful in the state and that Massachusetts protections prohibit discrimination based on gender identity in healthcare settings. The state also maintains shield-law protections intended to prevent outside jurisdictions from punishing patients, families, and providers for healthcare that is legal in Massachusetts, but those protections have not stopped federal pressure from reaching the clinics themselves.

The Trump administration has cut federal Medicaid and CHIP support for specified gender-affirming care for young people, turning healthcare funding into leverage over whether treatment remains financially sustainable. Massachusetts has responded by committing state resources to preserve coverage for minors who rely on public insurance. The state has also pointed to its Affirming Health Care Trust Fund as part of the effort to keep affirming providers operating while federal support is withdrawn, meaning Massachusetts is now spending its own money to defend access to healthcare that remains legal under its own laws. Even with that response, some providers have still pulled back.

Fenway Health, Baystate Health, and Outer Cape Health Services are important because their decisions expose the limits of protection on paper. A court ruling cannot make a clinician remain available, a shield law cannot automatically reopen a program after a provider restricts it, and state funding can replace some lost federal money without instantly rebuilding access when healthcare institutions decide that continuing treatment carries too much federal risk.

For trans patients, those institutional decisions are not abstract. Losing a provider can interrupt continuity of care and force families to search for alternatives. The burden of rebuilding that care falls on the patient and family whose treatment was disrupted.

Massachusetts has also been winning important legal battles against federal attempts to restrict gender-affirming care. Courts have blocked or struck down federal actions that threatened providers or would have made certain care more expensive and harder to access. Those victories preserve important rights and prevent some federal restrictions from taking effect, but they do not automatically restore a clinic that has already retreated.

That failure is already visible on the ground. Massachusetts can win a case, preserve insurance protections, fund care with state money, and shield families from outside interference while a trans young person still discovers that the provider they relied on will no longer treat them. The difference between legal protection and lived access is where federal pressure does much of its damage.

The federal government does not need Congress to enact a single nationwide ban in order to shrink gender-affirming care. Funding restrictions can make treatment more expensive for states to preserve, investigations and compliance pressure can raise the institutional cost of continuing programs, and hospitals and clinics can respond by narrowing services. When that happens, the formal legality of care survives while the infrastructure needed to deliver it begins disappearing around the patient.

Providers still make choices inside that pressure. Federal coercion does not erase the consequences of institutional retreat. When a healthcare system limits or ends a program, it is the trans patient who loses the appointment, the clinician, or the continuity they had been relying on.

Provider accountability is also part of the story because institutions that serve trans communities cannot be discussed only as passive victims of federal policy when their decisions determine whether patients still have somewhere to go. Federal pressure explains the environment in which those decisions are being made; it does not make the resulting loss of care disappear.

Massachusetts is fighting back through litigation, state funding, shield protections, and public commitments to preserve access. That resistance matters because it demonstrates that states are not powerless against federal attacks on trans healthcare, but the experience of trans youth also shows that resistance measured only in statutes and court orders is incomplete. The real measure is whether a patient can still receive care.

A young trans person should not have to navigate federal reimbursement policy, multi-state litigation, shield laws, provider liability, and institutional decisions simply to determine whether the healthcare legally protected in their state will actually remain available. Yet that uncertainty is exactly what sustained federal pressure can create.

The contradiction Massachusetts now faces is therefore larger than one clinic or one federal rule. The state has built legal protections around gender-affirming care, defended those protections in court, and committed public money to keeping treatment available. Federal pressure is still reaching patients through the institutions that are pulling back.

Even with state protection, insurance coverage, court victories, and shield laws behind them, a patient in Massachusetts can still lose the clinician who was providing their care. Until patients can reliably reach the treatment those protections promise, the right remains legally protected but practically vulnerable.

When lawful trans healthcare can disappear clinic by clinic, documenting who is withdrawing care — and what pressure is driving those decisions — becomes part of accountability.

Trans United tracks where protections fail trans people in practice and keeps those failures in the public record.

Upgrade to a paid subscription to support independent Trans United reporting and accountability work.

Upgrade