Ken Paxton Uses State Power Against Trans People—But Refused Questions About Himself
The Texas attorney general left a law-enforcement press conference after reporters raised questions about his property holdings and possible election-law violations.
Ken Paxton has used the power of the Texas attorney general’s office to pursue doctors, restrict gender-affirming care, and extend state enforcement into the mental-health support available to trans young people. His office has sued medical providers, secured court orders preventing doctors from practicing while litigation continued, and issued a 2026 legal opinion asserting that Texas’s restrictions on gender-affirming medical care for minors also apply to licensed mental-health providers.
Those actions carry consequences beyond Paxton’s press releases. Providers can face investigations, lawsuits, and threats to their ability to practice. Trans young people can lose access to care and trusted professional support. Families are forced to navigate a state enforcement system that treats support for a trans child as conduct to police. Paxton demands records, legal compliance, and accountability from the people and institutions he targets.
At a Fort Worth press conference Tuesday, reporters gave the state’s attorney general an opportunity to accept scrutiny himself. He refused.
Paxton appeared alongside 22 sheriffs to promote his law-enforcement credentials and attack the record of his Democratic Senate opponent, state Rep. James Talarico. When a reporter asked about recent reporting concerning Paxton’s real-estate holdings, Paxton said he wanted to keep the event focused on law enforcement and declined to answer.
The reporting documented a portfolio of at least 15 properties valued at roughly $9 million, including luxury condominium holdings in Utah. The existence and estimated value of those properties do not by themselves establish corruption or criminal conduct. But when a reporter asked Paxton to address the reporting, he chose not to explain the holdings or answer the question.
A second reporter asked why Paxton had voted in Collin County. ProPublica and The Texas Tribune reported that he appears to have voted in six elections over two years using an address where he no longer lived—conduct that may have violated Texas election law. The reporting did not establish that Paxton committed voter fraud, and no final legal finding has been made.
🎥 Ken Paxton refused questions about his property holdings and his reported voting address before his team ended the press conference.
Paxton did not answer the voting-address question. A staffer repeated that questions would be limited to law enforcement, and his team soon ended the press conference. Paxton then left without addressing the issue.
The setting made that refusal more revealing. Earlier in 2026, Paxton announced a public tip line for suspected illegal voting and declared that his office would “stop at nothing” to uncover unlawful voting activity. Yet when reporting raised questions about whether his own voting practices complied with the law, he treated the subject as outside the permitted boundaries of a law-enforcement event.
His refusal is not proof that he broke the law, and leaving under questioning is not an admission of guilt. It does, however, expose the unequal accountability system surrounding his use of public power.
Trans people, families, doctors, therapists, and supportive institutions are expected to answer the state’s demands. They can face lawsuits, investigations, restrictions, and professional consequences when Paxton decides their conduct deserves scrutiny. When reporters asked whether his own property holdings and voting practices deserved examination, he decided which questions counted as law enforcement and which ones he would not answer.
That unequal standard is the story. Paxton’s office uses enforcement power aggressively against trans people while retaining the ability to shut down questioning when accountability turns toward him.
For the communities targeted by his authority, there is no aide available to end the investigation.
Ken Paxton has used Texas state power to restrict trans care and pursue the professionals who provide it. His refusal to answer questions about his own conduct exposes an accountability system built to scrutinize his targets while protecting its enforcer.
Upgrade to a paid subscription to support independent reporting that documents anti-trans state power and keeps the people harmed at the center.