A proposed TV ratings review would treat transgender and nonbinary people as content parents must be warned about, raising free speech, state censorship, and civil rights alarms.
The problem is that they are not asking whether the content is harmful.
They are asking whether certain people can be classified as harmful content.
That is the line that should concern everyone. Once regulators start treating the existence of trans people as something requiring a warning label, the discussion is no longer about television ratings. It is about who gets treated as acceptable in public life.
I am questioning their content just as in a whole because I question their ability to even make that decision is what I’m saying lol because ya I agree there is a fine. I should of explained better sorry ✨
Entire wars, civilian deaths, and attacks on schools are treated as background noise, yet trans people existing can suddenly become something the government claims the public needs to be warned about.
That contrast reveals the priorities. The warning label is not about harm. It is about who gets singled out as a target.
FCC should check to see if their own content is harmful wtf
The problem is that they are not asking whether the content is harmful.
They are asking whether certain people can be classified as harmful content.
That is the line that should concern everyone. Once regulators start treating the existence of trans people as something requiring a warning label, the discussion is no longer about television ratings. It is about who gets treated as acceptable in public life.
I am questioning their content just as in a whole because I question their ability to even make that decision is what I’m saying lol because ya I agree there is a fine. I should of explained better sorry ✨
but bombs being dropped on the boats of fisherman, or on a school for girls? Spread that shit everywhere!
The selective outrage is part of the story.
Entire wars, civilian deaths, and attacks on schools are treated as background noise, yet trans people existing can suddenly become something the government claims the public needs to be warned about.
That contrast reveals the priorities. The warning label is not about harm. It is about who gets singled out as a target.